<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CelebAmour &#187; howard-k.-stern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.celebamour.com/tag/howard-k-stern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.celebamour.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Anna Nicole may have been pregnant again</title>
		<link>http://www.celebamour.com/2007/02/09/anna-nicole-may-have-been-pregnant-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.celebamour.com/2007/02/09/anna-nicole-may-have-been-pregnant-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gayla McCord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Nicole Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard-k.-stern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebamour.com/2007/02/09/anna-nicole-may-have-been-pregnant-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Anna Nicole Smith could be pregnant again — or not.
A segment aired on &#8220;Entertainment Tonight&#8221; Wednesday showed the 39-year-old ex-Playboy playmate getting her hair done before an interview.
Turning to the cameras, Smith said,  &#8220;I think I might be pregnant again.&#8221;
She added, &#8220;I&#8217;m not ready. (But) Howard wants to have another baby, he wants to have a little boy.&#8221;
Smith was referring to Howard K. Stern, her partner and father of her three-month-old daughter Dannielyn.
A few minutes later, she realized that she may have said a little bit too much.
&#8220;I feel we should change the subject,&#8221; she said, giggling.
The show reported [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.celebamour.com">CelebAmour</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Anna Nicole and Howard Stern" id="image770" src="http://www.celebamour.com/files/2007/02/annanicoleinterview.jpg" /></p>
<blockquote><p>Anna Nicole Smith could be pregnant again — or not.</p>
<p>A segment aired on &#8220;Entertainment Tonight&#8221; Wednesday showed the 39-year-old ex-Playboy playmate getting her hair done before an interview.</p>
<p>Turning to the cameras, Smith said,  &#8220;I think I might be pregnant again.&#8221;</p>
<p>She added, &#8220;I&#8217;m not ready. (But) Howard wants to have another baby, he wants to have a little boy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Smith was referring to Howard K. Stern, her partner and father of her three-month-old daughter Dannielyn.</p>
<p>A few minutes later, she realized that she may have said a little bit too much.</p>
<p>&#8220;I feel we should change the subject,&#8221; she said, giggling.</p>
<p>The show reported that off-camera Smith told producers that she wasn&#8217;t really pregnant, she was just kidding.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is all so very sad!  I certainly hope, for the sake of her baby, that this all turns out to be just a horrible, horrible accident.<br />
<strong><a href="http://www.showbuzz.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/29/people_milestones/main2217594.shtml">source</a></strong></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.celebamour.com">CelebAmour</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.celebamour.com/2007/02/09/anna-nicole-may-have-been-pregnant-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Photos of Anna Nicole, Daniel and Baby Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.celebamour.com/2006/09/18/first-photos-of-anna-nicole-daniel-and-baby-hannah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.celebamour.com/2006/09/18/first-photos-of-anna-nicole-daniel-and-baby-hannah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gayla McCord</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna_Nicole_Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anna_nicole_smiths_son]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity_baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daniel_smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hannah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard-k.-stern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.celebamour.com/2006/09/18/first-photos-of-anna-nicole-daniel-and-baby-hannah/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As first reported on Friday afternoon, Getty Images sent an email out to celebrity weekly editors hawking photos of Anna Nicole Smith, her newborn daughter, and her son, Daniel. The pictures were taken in the Bahamian hospital where, the next day, Daniel was found mysteriously dead. For an initial asking price of $200K, Getty would provide a handful of the tender! heartbreaking! tragic! images, the only caveat being that the buyer had to refrain from running the photos with any sort of negative press &#8212; which may be easier said than done if and when toxicology reports are released.
By the [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.celebamour.com">CelebAmour</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As first reported on Friday afternoon, Getty Images sent an email out to celebrity weekly editors hawking photos of Anna Nicole Smith, her newborn daughter, and her son, Daniel. The pictures were taken in the Bahamian hospital where, the next day, Daniel was found mysteriously dead. For an initial asking price of $200K, Getty would provide a handful of the tender! heartbreaking! tragic! images, the only caveat being that the buyer had to refrain from running the photos with any sort of negative press &#8212; which may be easier said than done if and when toxicology reports are released.</p>
<p>By the day&#8217;s end, In Touch had supposedly bought the photos for well over $300K ($375K was the number we&#8217;d heard tossed around). But the real question: who made the profit? <a href="http://gawker.com/news/anna-nicole-smith/final-dollarfetching-moments-between-anna-nicole-smith-and-her-son-201294.php"><strong>Full article&#8230;</strong></a></p></blockquote>
<p>Out of consideration for Anna Nicole, her daughter and the memory of her son, I&#8217;ll not post the photos myself.  Personally I find them heartwrenching to think that a moment that&#8217;s so very precious as this could be sold on the auction block like it was just another day on the set.</p>
<p>If you care to view the photos there are several <a href="http://gawker.com/news/anna-nicole-smith/final-dollarfetching-moments-between-anna-nicole-smith-and-her-son-201294.php"><strong>Getty images here</strong></a></p>
<p>My heart goes out to Anna Nicole &#8211; it&#8217;s not going to be tough just now, but in the years to come &#8211; as baby Hannah&#8217;s birth celebration will always have the dark cloud lurking just above as a mother mourns the progressing anniversary of the loss of her first born.</p>
<p>In ending, I have to side with many of the others keeping watch on this story and say that something is terribly shady about this Howard K. Stern dude! </p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.celebamour.com">CelebAmour</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.celebamour.com/2006/09/18/first-photos-of-anna-nicole-daniel-and-baby-hannah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
